free webpage hit counter

Controversial Michael Jackson songs removed from streaming services

Controversial Michael Jackson songs removed from streaming services

Three songs from the posthumous Michael Jackson album “Michael” from 2010, which some fans have long insisted were not sung by the deceased artist, have been removed from the streaming services.

A statement from Jackson’s property and Sony Music, which bought the rights to unreleased material from the singer’s vault in a $ 250 million big movie deal in 2010, said the songs were removed in an attempt to “get beyond” the controversy, but did not address them. whether or not the vowel was false.

“The Estate of Michael Jackson and Sony Music decided to remove the tracks” Breaking News “,” Monster “and” Keep Your Head Up “from the 2010 album” Michael “as the easiest and best way to go beyond the conversation related to them the tracks once and for all “, it is stated in the statement, issued on Tuesday, according to Billboard. “The remaining tracks on the album remain available. Nothing should be read into this action regarding the authenticity of the tracks – it’s just time to move beyond the distraction around them,” it concludes.

The songs in question have been at the center of an unusually aggressive legal campaign by fans that was eventually won by the estate in 2018. They were reportedly recorded in 2007 with songwriter / producers Edward Cascio and James Porte, two years before Jackson’s death from an accidental overdose. Fans have long claimed that an American vocalist named Jason Malachi actually sang the three songs, and he is said to have admitted so much in a Facebook post from 2011, according to TMZ, although his manager later denied it and claimed that the post was fake.

See also  Denzel Washington's darkest film is crushing it on streaming

The lawsuit began in 2014, when a fan tried to file a class action lawsuit, claiming that the album’s liner notes, which show Jackson as the singer, were in fact a misrepresentation under California’s unfair competition law and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. However, the anchor court ruled that because the estate and Sony did not know for sure whether Jackson sang on the three songs, the album’s cover and promotional material were protected by the First Amendment.

“Under these circumstances, appellant’s representations about the singer’s identity were a statement of opinion rather than facts,” California Judge Elwood Liu wrote at the time. “The lack of personal knowledge here also means that the appellants’ accused statements do not fit the definition of speech that is’ less likely to be cooled by proper regulation ‘.”

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.