free webpage hit counter

The DNC panel could meet again before the August meeting to determine early primary states – The Nevada Independent

The DNC panel could meet again before the August meeting to determine early primary states – The Nevada Independent

Good morning, and welcome to Indy DC Download the newsletter, a weekly look at what’s happening in the nation’s capital when it comes to Nevada.

If a colleague or colleague sent you this newsletter by e-mail, please click here to register and receive your own copy of Indy DC Download in your inbox.


Democratic officials are considering adding a new meeting before they convene in August to decide which states will be allowed to hold early primary elections from the 2024 cycle, including which states will go first.

The meeting is likely to take place on July 17, according to James Roosevelt, co-chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Rules and Bylaws Committee (RBC).

“There is a lot for us to discuss, I think, before our meeting in August,” Roosevelt said at an RBC meeting on Friday in Washington, DC.

The panel also gathers more detailed information from states to provide to the 32 members of the committee, who will select up to five states to hold early primary elections. According to the plan, RBC will meet 5-6. August, when it is likely to make its decisions on which states to hold early primary elections and the order in which they will be conducted. The entire DNC will address the panel’s recommendations at its September meeting.

The meeting comes after 16 states, including Nevada and Puerto Rico, gave presentations to the committee last month. Silver State has finished third behind Iowa and New Hampshire in recent primary cycles, but is pushing to go first in 2024. South Carolina has traditionally been number four, the last state in the DNC’s early window.

See also  How to download the recordings from Ring Video Doorbell

The main criteria RBC considers are diversity, competitiveness and feasibility to hold a competition. The Nevada Democrats have claimed that the state is unique in line with RBC’s goals.

And during the committee’s discussion of the primary calendar on Friday, some members of the panel indicated that they agreed with Nevada officials, even though they did not explicitly support any state.

“Why can we not do more of what we have already seen to be successful?” said Tonio Burgos of New Jersey. “I think Nevada and South Carolina have been exceptionally successful. And I think we can do more of that.”

Nevada first became an early state in the 2008 cycle, part of the legacy of the late Democratic Senator Harry Reid, who pushed for the state’s inclusion in the early window. The current push is led by former Reid staff, including Rebecca Lambe, his longtime political adviser, in partnership with the Nevada Democratic Party.

Panelists said they want the early states to act as a melting pot that will best prepare the Democratic candidate for victory in parliamentary elections. They pointed to the fact that the current four early competitions have combined to choose the winner of the popular poll since 2008.

And members of Iowa and New Hampshire – the current first and second states – underlined this success by warning against any change in the calendar that would not produce a better result.

“I really want the best possible process,” said Scott Brennan of Iowa. “We want the strongest possible nominee. I will only return to “be ashamed if we change a process that has resulted in victories, for the sake of change.”

See also  Download this Christmas gift guide now and share with your customers!

Joanne Dowdell of New Hampshire, possibly Nevada’s biggest rival to go first, warned of a potential negative effect on the interim periods in November, but did not elaborate.

“Any change can really negatively impact the outcome of this midterm election,” Dowdell said. “While this is a process for 2024, our decision could have an impact, not just in my state, but in other states around the country.”

Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) is in one of the toughest Senate races this cycle. Hassan and Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) delivered the state’s presentation to RBC last month.

But Leah Daughtry of New York argued that change is justified given that Iowa and New Hampshire are not as different as the country.

“Democratic voters have changed enough that people in the communities I go to want to know why the line-up is the way our line-up is and why the earliest states do not reflect the foundations of the Democratic Party,” Daughtry said. “So I think it guarantees change, it guarantees research. I do not think it is an exercise in futility, or in irritation, to say that it is time to consider a change in our process.”

Mo Elleithee of the District of Columbia agreed, arguing that involving several under-represented constituencies, such as Latinos, African Americans and Asian and Pacific Islanders, early in the process would strengthen the candidates.

“We all see if elections change, demographics change, coalitions change and if we do not get voters in these new coalitions, in these changing coalitions in some of these newly emerging battlefield states, if we do not get them our candidates earlier in the process, we put ourselves at a disadvantage, “said Elleithee.” We tie our hands, we actually make our candidates weaker. “

See also  Follow these simple steps to download Aadhaar cards to your smartphone

For a complete overview of the measures the delegates supported or opposed this week, check it out Nevada Independent‘s congressional vote tracking and other information below.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.